I add these question-driven pages to the web in faith that more people might better understand how we got where we are, and utilize opportunities to jump in and make things better when we can. I believe that is the heart of applied political psychology (Poly-Psy) - since I'm primarily into self-application, and here, into the self application of, by, and for citizens. There is an organized set of page section links Just below the intro. Introduction |
![]() |
* we can focus on what we have done * we can focus on what we could have done * we can focus on what is being done * we can focus on what we CAN DO from here * we can focus on anything but any of the above (not!) For all of those foci, save the last - whether we see politically, socially, or psychologically - there are pages and/or sections at this site. [Remember the *Open in New Tab* option via right-click]. I recognize that we are challenged, yet I believe in our capacity to learn -- especially to learn to persist in learning. Because, if we can do that -- and if God intended for us to evolve on this planet to the point of success where humans actually get along with each other (while still in human body form) -- then it will be done through persisting in *learning how* to do that.
This site is not always up to date, but I trust that through the resources provided, you can find updated information and resources for letters and petitions to sign, protests and rallies to go to, and as much else as you have time for - including how not to burn out. There is also the Poly-Psy Arts mailing list for the most recent postings on what's going on. Postings are only by myself, and are primarily about peace & justice, citizen effectiveness and action resources - local, national, Mid-East. You can join the list or just peruse the Archives (by date or use the search engine). [Just in case your areas of ignorance include mailing lists, after you click this link, join the list, a pre-addressed email window should open. Put "Subscribe" in the subject line but put nothing in the body of the message] There is A LOT at this site. There are plenty of section links to help you navigate these very long pages (I do them by hand, ok? And some day, I promise, I'll make a million regular sized pages out of them. Ok, maybe not a million... ). But I've heard it's very easy to get too spread out and scattered here, so be careful of the links taking you too far too often [Suggestion: if your browser doesn't support the *Open-in-New-Tab* option via right-click, then grab the scroll bar, brief the whole page, note the sections and links that stand out for you, then come back and read - and then hop a link when ready, knowing your browser's *Back* button is at hand). As for this page, I try not to make it too stiff for a grin now and then [Ok, I can even be a tad cruel-witted on those who tend to be cruel to millions of people - hoping Karma will be kind to me]. One of my goals is the effective presentation of the questions and considerations. I appreciate your feedback towards helping me achieve/further that goal - via PolyPsyArt@iinet.com (please incl. "permit2chris" in body of email)
|
to Impeach Bush & Cheney and Send Rove to Jail (for starters, and by '09, have all the others join him) Find Link-loaded Messages for quickly getting your sigs on petitions and sending letters to Elected Officials via PolyPsyList Archives: Use "Impeach" in its efficient Search Engine, sort by latest, etc. PolyPsy List Message 38 of '06 May still be still useful. Related: Impeachment Resource Links; For a quick read to dispel doubt of need, see Myths About Impeachment |
On March 13-16, 2008, Iraq Veterans Against the War members gathered near Washington DC to disclose the realities of U.S. war policy, to share eyewitness stories that have been censored from the American public about the true human cost of these occupations. They need your support! There are many ways to help. There will continue to be live audio/video feeds from the Washington DC hearings available to present at your local event. Listen to Audio Clips from Participating Veterans! |
![]() Winter Soldier II |
| Contents/Links for Christopher's Political Page(s) Updated July '08 | |||
| "Politics, Psychology, & ...Mirrors..." Bio: How A Marine became a Veteran for Peace "The Four Governments" beliefs, fantasy, & realities - working & not |
STOPPING the MID-EAST-WARS: Editorials, PolyPsyArt, & Activism with Veterans & Others for Peace & Justice on separate page (3/6/08) |
Socially Responsible Activism Project Vote Smart Extensive & Non-Partisan Resources & More Partisan Resources |
|
| Getting Real About Conspiracies (& belief system of the power elite) Handling Conspiracy Theories & Questionable News, Unfamiliar Internet Sources, etc; also on "Memory, Tracking, & Forgiveness" |
The Energy Working Section Some Practical (NEW?) Energy Efficiency Ideas |
Responsible Shopping & Economic Mgt, Collected Essays on War-Related Economics & Inequality ...and Genetically Engineered Foods (each now on separate pages) | |
|
Recovering Democracy at the Crossroads - Political Activism, Apathy, & Healing" (on a separate page) Introducing a study in current Poly-Psy with three graphic flow charts and discussion points, including: ¤ strategy for the healing & preventative maintenance necessary for our creating & sustaining a working democracy ¤ cause and effect patterns related to conscious choices for change toward sustainable living on the planet (a long term project). ¤ Relationships in "Beliefs, Paths, & Service" with a chart that visually relates various philosophical origins, coping styles, roles in active citizenry... Overall, this page provide a good intro to the (below linked) "OverComing Political Disillusionment" outline/study. | |||
| PolyPsyArts Mailing List Archives for Current Events Postings (with simple or advanced search engine capability) |
Most Recent News From the Progressive Left |
|
|
| NAMASKARA ("I salute the divinity within you") And I honor our capacity to rock and roll with life, to see and utilize the opportunities that exist to make things better when we can. |
World Healing Prayers Page on Sacred Geometry Backgrounds | ||
| What could be accomplished if more than 40% of Americans felt empowered enough to Vote? Would we create a government that actually represented our highest values? "OverComing Political Disillusionment" (on a separate page) Provides an OUTLINE FOR STUDY of UNDERLYING PSYCHOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS related to: ¤ current political challenges effecting American citizens and our changing government ¤ the basis of democratic participation & the power to make a difference for the world ¤ attitudes, beliefs, and resulting momentums that contradict our self-stated values while pushing us dangerously deeper into denial | |||
| "Questions for Healing Disillusionment" (on a separate page) Has Selected Questions for Consideration regarding how effectively we use the democratic process, or let totalitarian forces rise to destroy it. Includes "Questions for Personal Empowerment," "Development of One Questioning Mind," and "Preventing/Overcoming Burnout for Activists" (a suggested class outline). | |||
| How is it the Neo-Con artists get away with such "obvious" games & whoppers? Machiavengelicals Exposed (on a separate page) explains the Machiavellian Use of Evangelical fervor - for World Corporatocracy Not Democracy - Exposed with PolyPsyArt, references, and links. |
And why are so many citizens in denial of our current political directions ? "Messages" (on a separate page) - Poly-Psy 222: how so many citizens have (unwittingly) contributed to our political circumstances; a quick sum-up - reading between the lines - of the basic communications between the Bush Administration and too many citizens. |
And where do we find the basis for many of these statements ? The Political Reference Page (on a separate page) A Would-be Endless Collection of annotated links that tell and document much of the current story and relevant history -- organized with most sections updated (as often as can - considering they keep pouring in...) But don't forget the PolyPsy mailing list Archives for the most current updates. | |
| Copyright/Disclosure/Author & HomePage Info Email Christopher via PolyPsyArt@iinet.com[Moved from AOL July '06]
Web Site Support System & Guest Book Christopher's Personal Page |
|||
Some Quotes "A democracy exists only when knowledge, pure without influence of power, can exert its force on government and upon a free and knowledgable public, by men responsible to that public. Knowledge does not now have democratic relevance in America." -- Charles W. Mills in *The Power Elite* ______________ The words below appear on p. 226 of Al Gore's new book, *The Assault on Reason* (2006) "Should we amend all of the textbooks in America to explain to schoolchildren that what has been taught for more than two centuries about checks and balances is no longer valid? Should we teach them instead that the United States Congress and the courts are merely advisory groups that make suggestions to the president on what the law should be, but that the president is all-powerful and now has the final say on everything? Should we teach them that we are a government of men, not of laws? Should we teach them that we used to be a democracy but now we only pretend to be?" From pages 112-113 a passage that cuts to the heart of the matter: "Is it possible that Bush and Cheney truly believed the false assertions they foisted on the American people and our allies? Leonardo da Vinci once wrote, "The greatest deception men suffer is from their own opinions." And investigative journalist I. F. Stone wrote in A Time of Torment: "All governments lie, but disaster lies in wait for countries whose officials smoke the same hashish they give out." If Bush and Cheney actually believe in the linkage that they assert in spite of all the evidence to the contrary presented to them contemporaneously - that would would by itself make them genuinely unfit to lead our nation. On the other hand, if they knew the truth and lied, massively and repeatedly, isn't that worse? Are they too gullible or too dishonest?"
From pages 221-22 from the chapter "Democracy in the Balance": "President Bush has repeatedly violated the law for six years. In spite of the fact that the only judicial decision to have reached the question of legality has ruled comprehensively against the president's massive and warrantless surveillance program, both the Justice Department and the Congress have failed to take any action to enforce the law. There has been no request for a special prosecutor, and there has been no investigation by the FBI. There has been deafening silence. But the consequences to our democracy of silently ignoring serious and repeated violations of the law by the president of the United States are extremely serious." |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
from Political Disillusionment to Recovery and Activism How did I "convert" from a student of war as an adolescent, later a US Marine, to a student of cooperation, non-violent problem solving, and conscious preventative health maintenance (for individuals, then society)? And without being gay or communist? (I know, that only matters to the Rush Limbaugh crowd. But they probably need to read this story more than anyone. The same people that would care if I clarified that Obama is a Christian, not a Muslim, by the way.) I don't know if my telling this story will help anyone else make such a transition (now where's that sign up pad...), but I'm going to share here some of what led me to question authority, to hold signs with others or alone, to live simply and forego utilizing my talents and resources for those employers who would pay generously to have me trade in my values to work for them. I don't ask any reader to quit a career over this. But I might ask the reader to question and weigh what kinds of things might work best for all concerned. And then I might ask the reader to find his/her best individual place in society (including one's existing workplace or vocation) and the most optimal way to contribute, given one's own talents, capabilities, and resources. I appreciate you for simply visiting these pages. |
![]() Seriously VFP, June 2005 |
![]() |
Yes, our plane had landed in Viet Nam - in July of '72. Our C-141 parked for an hour on the warm quiet Ben Hoa airstrip. With that one hour having earned those three Viet Nam campaign/service medals (!), we took off for Thailand to serve - safely in tents and screen-walled buildings. Actually I worked, usually alone, in the only air-conditioned building on the base - troubleshooting communications on/off base. In any case, we techs also supported those F4's and Skyhawks - which flew close support for Marines in South Viet Nam, and which bombed North Viet Nam - and which killed people. And we did this from where we rarely heard, certainly never ducked - anything resembling explosions (except occassional very distant mortar practice by the grunts guarding the base). | ![]() |
|
Knowing Others is wisdom; Knowing the self is enlightenment. Mastering others requires force; Mastering the self needs strength. He who knows he has enough is rich. Perserverance is a sign of will power. He who stays where he is endures. To die but not to perish is to be eternally present. -- Chapter 33 of Tao Te Ching by Lao Tsu |
| Then came a course I took in the Fall of '78... While the class was offered through the Geography curriculum at O.U., it was much more about biology, ecology, environmental science, and the sociology that effected it so critically. We studied the most vital biological interdependence that interconnects every living organism. I found that these were truly nuts and bolts relationships, as if all organisms and connections were one living matrix throughout the planet (or Gaia).
We learned that we only had about 30 years before we could begin to make definite changes related to our environment or else give up any hope of sustaining life on the planet. [Note: 35 years later now, we are behind schedule and fighting hard to maintain what gains we've made. Thank you, Al Gore for fighting to awaken us to this!] Thus I came to see ... Earth would truly seem to be our *Mother*, as the Native Americans have tried (in vain?) to teach us. All this hit me very very deeply, as it dawned on me the contrast of these realizations: the overall political situation on the planet relative to the outlook for the ecology and sustainability of life on the planet. I didn't know what my place in this was, but in this, my first real spiritual-to-pragmatic epiphany, including reconciliation for my previous vocation (in the military), I began to feel some connection to what I so needed to find - tangible fullfillment of purpose for my life. And when I heard of the protest going on around Black Fox Nuclear Station at Inola (in NE Oklahoma), I knew I had to help out. In July of '79 I was arrested there, and that began the four or so years of activist work after college. In May of '80 I joined almost a million others around the Pentagon in the name of peace and justice, and was arrested at one of its doors with a number of my Quaker friends. As for many others, Civil Disobedience was only a small part of my growth in those days (graduation of one phase, and initiation of another). A late-blooming hippee was trying to catch up. |
![]() Chris, 1984 (4 yrs vegan) |
![]() Evolving Humanity |
It would seem to me that lately (2002-03) someone is trying to convince us (via the Rapture angle) that Jesus needs to rescue us -- because he doesn't believe in our ability to learn and grow by exercising Free Will, and that we can't learn to become responsible to choose our own directions, even by the hard way. Do you know what psychologists say about such a "rescuer" ? A rescuer is one of three roles that compose the (pathological) martyr personality -- along with the roles of victim and persecutor. And I have a most difficult time trusting someone, especially a self-proclaimed Christian, who would call Jesus a pathological martyr. I have an even more difficult time trusting someone who would "train" or condition others in his charge to be rescued - by a policy that is obviously designed to either bring on such an Armageddon or actually accomplish the ideal end of imperialism - world conquest. |
| -- Al Gore, just prior to becoming vice-president. |
The current political mess told me that many people today are as naive about as many things as I was. Reading the media on the other hand (more than just between the lines), requires skepticism like never before - even persistent research - but can go a long way. In the end, I trust the Love and Will of God to prevail (that we learn what that is and give over our own will (ego) to that, to I AM THAT I AM, THAT IS.) In the meantime 'the little will of men' (referring in part to "The Great Invocation" below) offer opportunities for the growth of our souls.
From the point of Light within the Mind of God Let light stream forth into the minds of men. Let Light descent on Earth. From the point of Love within the Heart of God Let love stream forth into the hearts of men. May Christ return to Earth. From the center where the Will of God is known Let purpose guide the little wills of men The purpose which the Masters know and serve. From the center which we call the race of men Let the Plan of Love and Light work out. And may it seal the door where evil dwells. Let Light and Love and Power restore the Plan on Earth. |
|
The "Power Elite", like other groups, have their cultural belief systems apart from other cultures, and they see the relationship between themselves & "the masses" as one of parents & children -- and they feel fine about not telling us all they know, do, are, plan, and about telling us what, when & how they see fit. So its not so much a conspiracy as it is a shared perspective out of which they operate. In fact, they may not even need to actually meet to act in unity on various issues and related ventures - it would simply be taken for granted. The various members, clubs, and communities among them may congregate, discuss, and make agreements on strategies and things that concern them. Regular folk concern them, but only because it usually takes the rest of us to actually do their work, or to make sacrifices - or sometimes to be sacrificed, especially if one lives in a 3rd world country. Hence, we shouldn't really take it personal - it's just business. Well, that wasn't really meant to be comforting. [A bit further below are some suggestions for handling conspiracy theories.]
Who are they? Which They? <grin> Well, in its "Elite Conference Guide" of Christmas 1987, the Economist described Bilderberg as 'Ne plus ultra' or 'the top of the top.' The Bilderberg office in Leiden, Holland may issue a 'press release' for it's meetings, but only a few hours after the last participant has left the meeting area. There are various theories about the Trilateral Commission, often contradictory about what all they do, and especially as to why various members may belong. The World Trade Organization (W.T.O.) or the European Round Table of Industrialists (E.R.T.) would seem to be at some steps down from this level of power, usually having publicized meetings, yet often including some members of the elite in their conferences. But naming or locating them is not what this essay is concerned with. How their minds and hearts create and allow all that they are and do - that is much more interesting to me. What are the rules for those "our betters" who create the rules for, and by which 'the false reality' is enforced upon, those deemed unworthy to know better ? How we respond to all that is far more important still. According to Charles Mills (mentioned above), among the power elite there are those who are quite philanthropic leaders, and those that play the political field for a time. There are those that utilize the "revolving door policy" to move from the military, to the corporate, to the government regulatory. And so on - if they choose to "work" by engaging in the more dynamic realms of power. Conflict of interest? From their point of view that is strictly a legal matter for their pawns to contend with - if anyone is successful in getting such a matter to court or before congress. Some have the attitude of a protective father, others are like a benign tyrant, others are not nearly so thoughtful of our future, and so on. There are those that participate with others of their status in spiritual or mystical organizations, as well as those in fundamentalist ones, etc. All this does not change the relevance of those power elite that play the power games with others lives via our elected representatives, and use other means of getting around the rules that everyone else play by. But remember, even the best hypnotists have to find participants that are willing to play along - at least subconsciously. So, maybe we have some mixed feelings we'd like to clarify (lest those subconscious desires for their approval, or fear of their disapproval, lead us to ...)? In summary, members of the power elite are a mixed bag - sort of. Some really love giving to others and some give only to get more power. And some act like no more than legitimate "gentlemen" Mafia, taking only a penny a day from each of us (at the point of a lie, instead of a gun. Ever try to add that up? They say it definitely beats robbing banks <grin>) Also please keep in mind that the larger corporations in America are not American, legally speaking, as they are largely beyond national laws and any requirements of national loyalty.
Other power elitists more often act like care takers for the less fortunate. Considering the incredibly slow response to the Global Warming, it would seem that immediate gratification is the presiding motivation. According to the Union of Concerned Scientists' latest reading (1999), we have about 70 years before what's left of us are wondering what happened, folks - like 1995 would definitely have NOT been too soon to really get with it. A more recent Global Warming report (Jan '04), not yet commented on by the UCS, closes the timeline considerably [noted Spring '04; Facts started hitting the fan a year later; in another year Bush tried to get away with talking like he discovered the problem himself - to even Rove's frustration! <grin>]. The time for change is NOW! For an astute and illuminating parallel on Global Warming, you've got to see the "Simple Test of User Propensity for Irresponsible Decisions (STUPID)." Now here's a counter-conspiracy conspiracy for you: Have you ever thought about what Neo-Cons & Libertarians have in common that is so opposed to the official principles and purposes of the U.N.? Of course these are only two of many forces affecting the order of things in the political world today. However, PNAC is generally never thought about in the same frame with thoughts about Spirituality. Libertarians, however would seem to have taken up a primary position of influence within the spiritual communities. The answer to the first question is the same answer to the question of what realm of influence is provided by the Libertarians into the spiritual realms -MONEY or *currency* or business or corporation. [Confusing? They make ya think don't they! <grin>] I do not believe that all the libertarian-influenced eclectics are paranoid about world government to the point of passing conspiracy theories about the UN being an invention of the trilateral commission, etc - let alone doing so with the knowledge that such conspiracies work in the favor of the purposes of PNAC and related "corporatocratic governors" (those Power Elite that are trying to create a more than virtual corporate government.) I believe that many "abundance" class teachers running the seminar circuit of the New Thought churches are either aware of these things, or are being influenced by those who are very aware. And so the influence might well have been passed on to many eclectics who take interest in more political matters, mixing those theories with whatever else is "hot," including theories about ET's (particularly the "reptilians") and origins of mankind. [If we are not the only "class M" planet in the universe, then why should we be the only ones here, let alone the most advanced, let alone totally invisible to those who are much more advanced? I believe there is some truth to many of these theories/testimonials - the operative word being *some,* the operative implication being "develop filters and don't just jump for the juicy." Having fun yet? <grin>] That's why we have the next main section just below. Counter-Counter: But I also believe there is a contest for power, and that contest revolves much around those who might become "empowered" and therefore much less easily manipulated. But not everything that might cause you to feel less-empowered is false. If something does, know that a) feelings are not rational, b) fear doesn't have to paralyse, c) you are not alone, and d) it helps to believe that challenges are for the purpose of building our capacities, e) There are even better pep-talks elsewhere at this site <smile>] The point being that 1) convoluted un/half-substantiated stories (whether engineered by Neo-Cons, Libertarian-cloaked CIA, or other power elitists) that are basically designed to ultimately (if not sooner) convince people they cannot make a difference about anything beyond their house payments are not designed to empower anyone but those who already have too much power for anyone's good. And that 2) we should stop helping them by (not) spreading such stuff unless done so expressly for research, comparitive analysis, or entertainment.
- and Questionable News or Unfamiliar Internet Sources (posted in 2000? edited 05/05/07) In the realm of media, it is now important that we know whatever limitations there are to objectivity - and use that knowledge as an asset. Some things, such as the below considerations, are helpful to keep in mind so as not to be misled by a conspiracy theory, let alone disenfranchised, even when it may be true to some degree. The essay on "The Four Governments" (further below) relates belief systems to perception of ones place relative to politics (and objectivity). As we these things in mind, we can develop more assets for sharpening our objectivity with the media. Most conspiracies contain a grain or more of truth. And most are generally communicated with a few of the same things in mind. That is, firstly, the (stated) target of the theory is kept relatively obvious, and the basic premise must be kept simple enough to keep it understandable, which means generalities and half-truths will likely abound. Secondly it needs to create a drama or "shock effect" in order to motivate the recipient in some way. (If you participate in "I can tell you something even more scary" conversations very often, then you are the addict conspiracy theorists depend on.) The trick in most conspiracy theories is the increasing complexity - multiple plot levels which enhance the novel-like building excitement. Many are designed for those who brief-read and for librarian types who often serve as the unofficial "fact-keepers" and fact distributors of a community, especially those based on exchange of political information. Too many folks don't take the time to unravel the "evidence," enjoying the brief moment of celebrity in passing on the stories. All of which, over time with enough of these kinds of stories, results in an underlying confusion within the reader, that can lead to feeling there is no way to do anything about the going's on of the powers that be, or giving up one's power to "the experts."
This is NOT to say that conspiracies don't happen, or that some people who are more "powerful" in some way or another (at least as a group), never make agreements about dealing with those less powerful in those way(s), and that over time such involvements can become very complex (as noted in above essay). Neither does it negate that one of the best ways to disenfranchise citizens is to convince them, through propagating conspiracy theories, that they have no power to change things. Because citizens always do have that power, I believe. But the sooner such challenges are recognized for what they are, the more quickly and easily can changes can be made that will make a difference. Some basics: The holding of any kind of power is not automatic, whether via the spoken or written word, whether political, psychological, or otherwise. In a democracy, power generally has to be willingly surrendered through the democratic process to the degree it is not circumvented. I didn't say that power had to be "consciously" surrendered. Manipulation is the basic means of acquiring power over someone else, whether the manipulation is for good or for ill, whether it happens by telling the truth or not, whether the person is in full conscious agreement of the manipulation or not. For example, you pay a chiropractor or massage therapist to manipulate your tissues into a more healthy alignment, or therapist to manipulate your awareness into a more healthful perspective about yourself and your world. Even a good hypnotherapist instructs so as to achieve the client's full conscious awareness of the process. To the degree that power is given up unconsciously, we call this brainwashing. The point here is that if you're being manipulated, and it's not by your conscious permission, then you're probably going to regret it. Speaking of projecting or scapegoating, does the phrase "axis of evil" come to mind? And the lies that so many Americans so easily swallowed about Iraq in '02-03? (Big thanks to Fox News.) From the way that Americans have been managing their memory and their trust the last 6 years, the term "magical thinking" (not to mention "denial"), comes to my mind. (One might equate the two processes.) Can we ever forgive the liars? Of course (with a lot of effort). Maybe if we start with those who believed so easily? Can we Forget? That would be sociopathic. Again: How can so many who believe in the death penalty be so quick to dismiss the mandate for accountability??? Accountability is critical NOW more than ever. (11'07) Case in point: It's Amazing (to me, anyway) how the Bushies actually argue against the basic need for accountability in a political office, not to mention at the presidential level. Silly me: before four years ago, I'd have thought they're simply doing *that* would earn them a jail cell. But notice how it's just become part of "the news." [Now THAT is some fancy programming, folks - How's that hook taste?!] How can so many who believe in the death penalty be so quick to dismiss the mandate for accountability??? Accountability is critical NOW more than ever. (11'07) How does one determine what news or sources to believe? Well, if you are so inclined to reading and study, and this applies to the internet as a resource in general, one way to sort things (that I have found effective) is "theory stacking." It's probably similar to how a good detective views the stories of suspects and witnesses. I also apply this method to assessing the reliability of sources of news on the internet, whether from email or web sites. First off, for the method to work, I accept that a) personalities are never totally objective about everything (even those of our most trusted leaders), b) that some of those personalities might even specialize in disinformation, and others may sometimes speak or publish before they really know, c) there are often many ways to explain things, especially complex events, and d) that few of these ways are fully eliminatable, and most have some tidbit to offer, even if I should establish one explanation as sure fact. That established, I can *entertain* any number of explanations for an event that I make time to become aware of. I don't feel I need to remember all the details of a theory, but retain the gut feeling about it, and just keep a copy accessible for later reference. Then as a given theory shakes out more plausible relative to the other theories in the stack what I do is let it rise to the top of the "theory stack." That is, it would rise in my mind's visualization of it. (This method is probably related to my enjoyment of making and using charts.) eg: Over time, I may notice some theories getting lots of support from various sources, even those that often contradict each other in other topic areas, and so that theory may rise in credibility way over the top of any other explanation. I don't call a theory "truth" although I might believe certain parts of the theory. And I often don't call one of them a total lie, even if it's (currently) at the bottom of the stack. Yet another approach - for the truly unconventional data researcher. And it's only going to work for those who are either already experienced in meditative contemplation or meditative prayer, or those who are sufficiently open and willing to apply themselves to that experience. And once you learn this approach, then you choose a situation to apply it to.
A more involved perspective (or theory) about what current politics seems to be handing us is at Questions For Disillusionment, which also includes a suggested class format for "Overcoming Burnout for Activists," as well as "The Development of One Questioning Mind" - my pre-sentencing statement at the trial of the "Seattle 12," arrested for sitting in at our senators offices as we tried to convince them not to give in to Bush's drive for the power to declare war any time he saw fit, and "Questions for Personal Empowerment" -- question-based affirmations over colorful tapestry background, emphasizing capacities for self-determination and re-defining personal values. |
(the "Fantasy," the "Masked," the "Elected," and the "True" Governments) One could say that there are actually four main governments that operate through our political system. (Notice that the word used here is "operate" and not "work.") These four governments pervade all levels of politics and actual government function, and exist THROUGH the belief systems of citizens. However, they do not all function as we might want to believe they do. Actually, they function partly in fantasy, much of it in disguise, too often in disjunction, largely by default in lieu of citizen participation, and intermittently in mysterious (perhaps miraculous) efficiency. The first is the government of the representative and democratic government that many of us learned to expect from those we elect - a fairy tale we would all like to believe in. Please let me clarify: There is a difference between the (functional) holding up of ideals in order to then, step by checked-upon step, create realistic priorities and goals, and the (dysfunctional) holding of ideals and then merely proceeding as if they are already realized. Obviously, the latter feels good but gets nothing done, and the former only works when the ideals are converted into something pragmatic and then implemented. On the other hand, it actually IS representative since it also represents the non-voting, the un-seeing, and the insincere that exists among us. I'll refer to it as the "Fantasy Government." The second government is that which governs those we elect when the people are fantasizing about the first government or just too often looking elsewhere. I refer directly to the power elite, which I'll call the "Masked" government, and yes it exists and definitely functions. "It" doesn't use conspiracy necessarily -- but with various and sundry, at times conflicting, but still very highly defined sets of agendas. A currently exposed example would be the tobacco industry. It is a powerful executor of only one agenda perhaps, but the precedents being set with this special interest are part of the agendas of many other special interests, who together will take as much of our financial capacity, our health, and certainly our power as we let them.
The third government is the body of politicians that we have elected, and which actually carry out government functions - more or less. I don't feel I need to say much about this the "Elected government," since it is what generates and fills most of our political media nowadays. The confusion that we experience (focusing on them), as we try to figure what they are really doing, is where the "smoke and mirrors" tricks work their magic on us. Just how much of that can you take before you get brain-dead dizzy and tuning out, if not consciously disillusioned and ticked off. And do you think this might have tended to effect one's memory after awhile -- until now as you read this, that is ? [Ok, I'm really trying to put a positive twist on this, .. Did I emphasize 'perception' or 'FOCUS' yet?] The fourth government is the conscious awareness and action of the citizenry when it is being truly responsible, by such as insuring that we elect and maintain people of integrity in office. Just how real this government is varies. I call it the "True" government, to the degree we are motivated in being ourselves and acting cooperatively, maybe even consistently, and manifesting our highest dreams and hearts' desires. Sometimes we see it happening, too often it seems we haven't. Right now the focus is on the images of the Elected since too few people know much (if any) of the reality of the Masked, too many are disillusioned from still trying to see the Fantasy, and not enough people make time to learn about and perform the duties of the True. While the Elected are generally _very_ knowledgeable about all four governments, they most enjoy the ignorance of the True (with sad but applicable irony in those words), and they thereby enjoy the rewards from the Masked. They have thus developed the double standards that citizens have been increasingly exposed to over the last three decades. But until one understands the extent and ramifications of the power elite's hold on the elected officials, we will continue to be dumb founded by the events and decisions that come from the Elected. ['We' meaning those of us who haven't resigned to the sheople's conspiracy theory - that it's safer for our ego, feelings, blood pressure, and overall safety, to believe it's useless and painful to believe we can or should make a difference. That it matters when those in charge of our health system are pressured to follow the political line vs what science has shown to be valid - a theocratic political line, at that.]
|
REALITY CHECK
Admittedly, I held lots of hope for the Elected man who seemed to be able to intelligently and thoughtfully explain most any political event or socio-political condition if one followed his logic long enough. I never liked sound-byte psychology anyway. He does make sense when he's not trying to please too many interests, or too many women. The latter subject brings in specific focus on that double standard so highly preserved by the Elected.
PLAYING THE STANDARDS
But we HAVE created a Fantasy government in recent years - psychologically speaking. If we are astute, and pay close attention -- not to the image hype, but to the bottom lines, we will see the strategy of the Masked be un-masked. We've been taken in by the lights and mirrors, but the horse and donkey show might just disgust us enough to draw back and see the stage and the whole panorama of gamery. [I may be stepping in a little deep here...] During the Clinton Administration the Masked and Elected had willingly cooperated to assist in highlighting the double-standard. This is a rare event (prior to 1992), so apparently they will do this only for critical reasons, and therefore only in specific directions. For this to happen, the official(s) at gun point would really have to go against the current of the Elected and Masked's agendas. Such agendas INCLUDE immorality and the double-standard in the ranks of the Elected, therefore the immorality of an elected official would not at all, just by itself, bring down this kind of fire power... continued after quote ...
I'm not just talking about the relatively minor and short-lived instances regarding some congressional representatives. I'm talking about a tremendous budget assigned to keep certain officials incapacitated, and to keep secret files secret. What? Think back (the 4 years before the 1992 election) to the brief but startling stories of the post-cold-war intelligence community: stories about the spies that would be out of work, the changes in power, and the various related events and investigations. How would a new administration investigate such complex power interplay? Remember those FBI files that somehow got linked with the Whitewater affair? And now, since 1992, we've seen the exposure (blackmailing?) of five or more congressmen in a season, then a few more every season up to the current times. You might be interested to take a look at 'CovertAction Quarterly' (Exposés -- recommended by Noam Chomsky)
IN SUPPORT OF FUNCTIONAL GOVERNMENT Believe it or not, from the view of people who believe more in overall health and well-being (via quality of sustained natural resource management as well as care for the handicapped, youth, and aged), President (Bill) Clinton had been acting quite often as a representative of the True government (The fourth of "The Four Governments," the conscious awareness and action of the citizenry when it is being truly responsible, that which insures we elect and maintain people of integrity in office). These objectives meet long-term goals and honor the capabilities of humanity. The grand exception to this was his considerable support of programs, falling into the hands of, and used instrumentally by, the World Trade Organization. Internationally, the sanctions on Iraq created a disaster. But otherwise... This is to contrast with efforts that unabashedly worsen the much lowered quality of food and water, sell products that obviously addict our own children to an unhealthy lifestyle which also leads to disease and an earlier and painful death, sell products to other countries we've outlawed here (including dangerous fertilizers and pesticides for crops and many unapproved/faulty medical drugs and supplies!), and addict those countries to feeding our addictions (tobacco, sugar, coffee, beef, and even cocaine when a war "justifies" it) at the expense of using up land that could otherwise feed the people of those countries. And when such interests need more, they so quickly have had legislation (e.g.: "Corporate Welfare") written and/or added as riders to take it. All to feed the media driven "needs" (desires, that is) for immediate gratification and then comes the political entertainment show with their crisis management -- negative cycles indicative of our short-sightedness. Maybe their calling Bill Clinton a whore wasn't inaccurate (any more than the pot calling the kettle black), but while they steal the peoples money through the prostitution of our ideals of fairness, not to mention of tax-paid resources ? And these people called Clinton's actions egregious, relative to the governing of our nation. This is the sort of thing that makes many wonder about conspiracies. Would you rather have your sons and daughters emulating someone who got blown (away?) and even of denying it afterwards, or emulating someone who got away with billions of dollars, the eradication of tens of thousands of jobs and/or the means of workers to feed, house, clothe, and clean themselves (by making useless or non-existent their water and farmland), and then saying this is how we have to do business in America and abroad? THE NEWS BEHIND THE NEWS A fine example of political diversionary tactics, made more easy by the public's incredibly short-term political memory, is the incredible set of legislation that Congress sneaked in/out during the Sept '98 internet "expose" during the Clinton Scandal -- not to mention various critical yet little heard-of international events: "Behind the Smoke & Mirrors" Other strategies include the "publication" of unexamined and selective perspectives put out as a "Legal" document ! It is one primary tactic in a strategy designed to intimidate due to its value to entertain (thus gain readership for the party line, not necessarily for the media, although all media in the U.S. are actually owned by 5 people -- all of whom are conservatives. (The one proclaimed exception to this doesn't pan out by any reasonable examination, and the proclamations are by the other four who happen to be ultra-conservatives.) Jeff Cohen, a riveting speaker, describes the media as "Weapons of Mass Distraction" ("Myth of the Liberal Media;" see link for Alternative Radio in Resource section, this page).
IF EACH CITIZEN KNEW S/HE WOULD BE ALIVE FIVE-HUNDRED YEARS FROM NOW, DO YOU THINK OUR POLITICAL ACTIONS WOULD BE DIFFERENT NOW? (Maybe like we cared for our children's children, y' think? What do you think has created such interference to our socio-political foresight and long-term memory? How are we to heal that? Hint: there are essays and links about pain, disillusionment, "Re-Membering," attainment of goals, motivation, and healing at this site, via the Body-Mind Integration Index. For example, speaking of these topics, long term goals, and of desires versus needs, you can check out: Essay, "Beliefs-Desires-Needs-Alignment" "Emotion & Motivation on the Path and in Healing" and The Outline for "Overcoming Political Disillusionment,"
| ||||